FederalMail Fraud

Aggressive federal defense against mail fraud charges involving schemes to defraud through the U.S. mail or private interstate carriers.

Close-up of a glowing blue printed circuit board with intricate electronic pathways and components.

Mail fraud is a serious federal crime that involves using the U.S. Postal Service or private interstate carriers to execute or attempt to execute a scheme to defraud another party of money or property. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, the federal mail fraud statute, prosecutors can charge individuals who use the mail system to further fraudulent activities. Mail fraud is one of the most frequently charged federal offenses and can result in substantial prison sentences, significant fines, and mandatory restitution to victims.

If you are under investigation or facing mail fraud charges in New York, New Jersey, or anywhere in the United States, you need experienced federal criminal defense representation immediately. At the Law Offices of Matthew Cohan, we defend clients charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 in the Southern, Eastern, and Northern Districts of New York, as well as the District of New Jersey. Our firm provides aggressive representation both before and after charges are filed, protecting your rights and fighting for the best possible outcome.

What Is Federal Mail Fraud Under 18 U.S.C. § 1341?

Federal mail fraud occurs when someone uses the United States Postal Service or any private or commercial interstate carrier (such as FedEx, UPS, or DHL) as part of a scheme to defraud or obtain money or property through false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.

The mail fraud statute is remarkably broad. It does not require that the fraudulent scheme succeed or that anyone actually lose money. The crime is complete when someone uses the mail in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme, regardless of whether the fraud was ultimately successful. This expansive scope makes mail fraud a powerful tool for federal prosecutors, who often charge it alongside or in place of other fraud-related offenses.

Originally enacted in 1872, the mail fraud statute has been repeatedly updated to cover modern forms of communication and commerce. Today, it applies not only to traditional letters sent through the U.S. Postal Service but also to packages, documents, and items sent through any private interstate carrier.

Elements of Federal Mail Fraud

To secure a conviction for mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, the prosecution must prove two essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. A Scheme to Defraud

The defendant must have devised or intended to devise a scheme or artifice to defraud, or a scheme to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.

What Constitutes a Scheme to Defraud:

A scheme to defraud is any plan, design, or artifice intended to deprive another person or entity of money, property, or the intangible right of honest services. The scheme must involve material misstatements or omissions. A misstatement is "material" if it is significant enough that it would influence the victim's decision.

The government does not need to prove that the scheme was successful or that anyone actually lost money. Even an attempted fraud that never comes to fruition can satisfy this element. The focus is on the defendant's intent to deceive, not on whether the deception succeeded.

Examples of Fraudulent Schemes:

  • Making false representations about investments or business opportunities
  • Concealing material facts in financial transactions
  • Misrepresenting the quality, characteristics, or availability of goods or services
  • Creating false invoices or billing for services never rendered
  • Using false identities or documents to obtain money or property
  • Operating Ponzi schemes or pyramid schemes
  • Making false claims to insurance companies or government agencies

Honest Services Fraud: Under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the term "scheme or artifice to defraud" includes schemes to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services. This provision has been used to prosecute public corruption and private sector fraud involving breaches of fiduciary duty.

2. Use of the Mail to Further the Scheme

The defendant must have used, or caused someone else to use, the United States Postal Service or a private or commercial interstate carrier for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute the fraudulent scheme.

What Satisfies the "Use of Mail" Element:

The mail does not need to contain fraudulent content itself. It is sufficient that the mailing was part of the execution of the scheme or was foreseeable as part of the scheme. Courts apply what is known as the "mailing in furtherance" test, which requires only that the mailing be incident to an essential part of the scheme or a step in the plot.

Common Examples of Mailings:

  • Sending fraudulent solicitations, advertisements, or promotional materials
  • Mailing contracts, applications, or agreements containing false information
  • Sending invoices for payment based on fraudulent transactions
  • Mailing checks or money orders obtained through fraud
  • Sending confirmation letters or receipts as part of a fraudulent transaction
  • Using interstate carriers to deliver goods misrepresented to buyers

Private Interstate Carriers: The statute explicitly covers private and commercial interstate carriers such as FedEx, UPS, and DHL. Any use of these services in furtherance of a fraudulent scheme satisfies the mailing element.

Innocent Third Parties: The defendant does not need to personally send the mailing. If the defendant's fraudulent conduct causes an innocent third party to use the mail in furtherance of the scheme, this satisfies the element. For example, if a defendant submits a fraudulent insurance claim and the insurance company mails a check in response, the defendant has used the mail for purposes of the statute.

Penalties for Federal Mail Fraud Under 18 U.S.C. § 1341

The penalties for federal mail fraud are severe and can result in lengthy prison sentences, substantial fines, and significant financial obligations.

Imprisonment

Standard Maximum: A conviction for mail fraud carries a maximum sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison for each count. Because each use of the mail can constitute a separate offense, defendants charged with mail fraud often face multiple counts, resulting in the possibility of consecutive sentences.

Enhanced Maximum for Financial Institution Fraud: If the mail fraud affects a financial institution (banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations), the maximum sentence increases to 30 years in federal prison per count.

Enhanced Maximum for Disaster-Related Fraud: If the mail fraud occurs in relation to or involves any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency, the maximum sentence increases to 30 years in federal prison per count.

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

While the statutory maximum provides the ceiling for sentencing, actual sentences are calculated using the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The guidelines determine a defendant's offense level based on multiple factors, with the amount of loss being the most significant:

Base Offense Level: The base offense level for fraud offenses is 7.

Loss Amount Enhancements: The guidelines add levels based on the amount of loss:

  • Loss under $6,500: no increase
  • Loss between $6,500 and $15,000: add 2 levels
  • Loss between $15,000 and $40,000: add 4 levels
  • Loss between $40,000 and $95,000: add 6 levels
  • Loss amounts continue to add levels exponentially
  • Loss over $550 million: add 30 levels

Other Enhancements:

  • More than minimal planning: add 2 levels
  • Sophisticated means (offshore accounts, shell companies, false documents): add 2 levels
  • Use of mass-marketing: add 2 levels
  • Violation of securities law or commodities law: add 2 levels
  • Deriving more than $1 million in gross receipts from financial institution: add 2 levels
  • Role in the offense (organizer or leader): add 2-4 levels
  • Obstruction of justice: add 2 levels

These enhancements can stack, resulting in very high offense levels that correspond to lengthy prison sentences even for first-time offenders.

Fines

Individuals convicted of mail fraud face fines of up to $250,000 per count. Corporations face fines of up to $500,000 per count. However, under the alternative fines provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3571, courts may impose fines equal to twice the gross gain derived from the offense or twice the gross loss to victims, whichever is greater. In cases involving substantial fraud amounts, these alternative fines can reach millions of dollars.

Mandatory Restitution

Courts must order restitution requiring defendants to compensate victims for their actual losses. Restitution is mandatory in fraud cases and must be paid in full before any fines are satisfied. Restitution obligations create federal liens on all assets and remain enforceable even after the defendant completes their prison sentence.

Forfeiture

Under 18 U.S.C. § 981 and § 982, defendants convicted of mail fraud may be required to forfeit property constituting or derived from proceeds of the fraud, as well as property used to commit or facilitate the offense. This can include real estate, vehicles, bank accounts, and business assets.

Supervised Release

Following any term of imprisonment, defendants typically face a period of supervised release (federal probation) lasting three years or longer. During supervised release, defendants must comply with numerous conditions, including regular reporting to a probation officer, restrictions on travel and employment, and prohibitions on engaging in certain business activities.

Collateral Consequences

A federal mail fraud conviction carries significant collateral consequences beyond the criminal penalties:

  • Permanent Criminal Record: A felony conviction appears on all background checks
  • Professional Licenses: Loss of professional licenses for attorneys, accountants, financial advisors, real estate agents, and other regulated professions
  • Employment: Difficulty obtaining employment, particularly in positions involving financial responsibility or fiduciary duties
  • Immigration Consequences: Non-citizens face deportation for crimes involving fraud or dishonesty
  • Security Clearances: Loss of federal security clearances
  • Firearms Rights: Loss of the right to possess firearms
  • Reputation: Permanent damage to personal and professional reputation
Common Types of Mail Fraud Prosecutions

Federal mail fraud charges arise in a wide variety of contexts. Some of the most common types of mail fraud schemes prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 include:

Investment and Securities Fraud

Investment fraud involves using the mail to deceive investors about the nature, risks, or returns of investments. This includes Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes, promissory note fraud, advance fee fraud, and misrepresentations about the nature or value of investment opportunities. Prosecutors often charge both mail fraud and securities fraud when investments are involved.

Investment and Securities Fraud

Investment fraud involves using the mail to deceive investors about the nature, risks, or returns of investments. This includes Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes, promissory note fraud, advance fee fraud, and misrepresentations about the nature or value of investment opportunities. Prosecutors often charge both mail fraud and securities fraud when investments are involved.

Mortgage and Real Estate Fraud

Mortgage fraud encompasses various schemes involving false statements in mortgage applications, inflated appraisals, straw buyers, equity skimming, and foreclosure rescue scams. When fraudulent documents are mailed to lenders, title companies, or other parties, mail fraud charges can result.

Healthcare and Insurance Fraud

Healthcare fraud includes billing for services not rendered, upcoding procedures, unbundling services, kickback schemes, and prescription fraud. When fraudulent claims, bills, or reimbursement requests are mailed to insurance companies, Medicare, or Medicaid, mail fraud charges can be filed.

Credit Card and Identity Theft Fraud

Credit card fraud schemes involving stolen credit card information, fraudulent applications, or account takeovers frequently involve use of the mail. When fraudulent credit cards are mailed to perpetrators or when stolen cards are used to purchase items delivered by mail, mail fraud charges apply.

Business and Corporate Fraud

Business fraud schemes include false invoicing, vendor fraud, procurement fraud, bid-rigging, and embezzlement schemes that involve mailing fraudulent documents, invoices, or payments.

Telemarketing and Mail-Order Fraud

Telemarketing schemes that involve mailing products, invoices, or solicitations can result in mail fraud charges. This includes fraudulent charitable solicitation, lottery and sweepstakes fraud, and failure to deliver goods paid for through mail order.

Government Benefits Fraud

Schemes to obtain Social Security benefits, unemployment benefits, disability benefits, or other government assistance through false representations can result in mail fraud charges when applications or communications are mailed.

Tax Fraud

Although tax crimes are typically charged under Title 26, when fraudulent tax documents are mailed to the IRS or when refund checks obtained through fraud are received by mail, prosecutors may also charge mail fraud.

Relationship to Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)

Mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) are parallel statutes with nearly identical elements. Wire fraud applies to fraudulent schemes that use interstate wire communications, including telephone calls, emails, text messages, and internet transmissions.

In modern prosecutions, wire fraud charges are often more common than mail fraud charges because electronic communications have largely replaced traditional mail. However, prosecutors frequently charge both mail fraud and wire fraud in the same case, particularly when a scheme involves both types of communication.

The penalties for wire fraud are identical to those for mail fraud: up to 20 years imprisonment for standard offenses, or up to 30 years when the fraud affects a financial institution or relates to a presidentially declared disaster or emergency.

Defenses to Federal Mail Fraud Charges

Defending against federal mail fraud charges requires sophisticated legal strategies, thorough investigation of the facts, and detailed understanding of fraud law. Common and effective defenses include:

Lack of Intent to Defraud

The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with specific intent to deceive or defraud. Demonstrating that the defendant acted in good faith, believed their representations were true, or made honest mistakes can negate the intent element. This defense may involve showing that the defendant relied on information provided by others, misunderstood business arrangements, or held a good faith belief in the legitimacy of the transaction.

No Material Misrepresentation

If the alleged false statements or omissions were not material (would not have influenced a reasonable person's decision), this defeats the fraud element. Sales puffery, subjective opinions, and minor inaccuracies that do not affect the substance of the transaction are not material misrepresentations. The defense may demonstrate that victims had access to accurate information, conducted independent due diligence, or were not actually deceived by the alleged misrepresentations.

No Use of Mail in Furtherance of Scheme

The government must prove that the defendant used or caused the use of the mail for the purpose of executing the fraudulent scheme. If mailings were merely incidental, occurred after the scheme was complete, or were not foreseeable as part of the scheme, they may not satisfy the statutory requirement. The defense may show that mailings served legitimate business purposes unrelated to any alleged fraud.

No Scheme to Defraud

If the government cannot establish that a coherent fraudulent scheme existed, the charges must fail. The defense may demonstrate that business arrangements were legitimate, that no deception occurred, or that any losses resulted from market conditions, bad business decisions, or other factors unrelated to fraud.

Insufficient Evidence

The prosecution bears the burden of proving every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Challenging the sufficiency and credibility of the government's evidence, including witness testimony, documents, and expert opinions, can create reasonable doubt and result in acquittal.

Former Prosecutor Advantage
Federal mail fraud cases are among the most complex white collar prosecutions, often involving extensive documentary evidence, financial analysis, and testimony from multiple witnesses. At the Law Offices of Matthew Cohan, our experience as a former prosecutor provides significant advantages in defending these cases:

Understanding Prosecution Strategy: We know how federal prosecutors build mail fraud cases, what evidence they prioritize, and how they present schemes to juries. This insider knowledge allows us to anticipate the government's approach and develop counter-strategies.

Challenging Financial Evidence: Mail fraud cases typically involve detailed financial analysis and loss calculations. We know how to challenge the government's loss figures, which directly affect sentencing exposure, and can retain qualified defense experts when necessary.

Negotiating Pre-Indictment: Many mail fraud investigations last months or years before charges are filed. Our prosecutorial background enables us to engage effectively with prosecutors during the investigation stage, potentially preventing charges from being filed or negotiating favorable resolutions before indictment.

Jury Trial Experience: While many federal fraud cases resolve through plea agreements, some must go to trial. We have extensive trial experience presenting fraud cases to juries and understand how to explain complex financial transactions and business arrangements in clear, persuasive ways.

Sentencing Advocacy: Even if a conviction occurs, sentencing provides critical opportunities to minimize consequences. We understand federal sentencing guidelines for fraud offenses and know how to present mitigation evidence effectively, including cooperation, acceptance of responsibility, restitution efforts, and personal circumstances that may warrant downward departures.

The Importance of Early Intervention

If you are under investigation for mail fraud, early intervention by experienced defense counsel is essential. Mail fraud investigations typically involve:

  • Grand jury subpoenas for documents and testimony
  • Search warrants executed at homes or businesses
  • Interviews with potential witnesses
  • Review of financial records, emails, and correspondence
  • Analysis by forensic accountants
  • Cooperation from alleged victims or co-conspirators

Early representation provides opportunities to:

  • Prevent charges from being filed through pre-indictment negotiations
  • Protect your rights during questioning by investigators
  • Prevent inadvertent destruction of potentially exculpatory evidence
  • Address grand jury subpoenas strategically
  • Preserve attorney-client privilege and work product protection
  • Explore cooperation options if appropriate

Do not speak with FBI agents, postal inspectors, or other federal investigators without legal representation. Statements made during investigative interviews can be used against you, and even innocent explanations can be misinterpreted or used to build the government's case.

Contact Our Federal Criminal Defense Firm

Federal mail fraud charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 are serious matters that require experienced, knowledgeable representation. At the Law Offices of Matthew Cohan, we provide comprehensive defense services to clients facing mail fraud investigations and charges throughout New York, New Jersey, and other federal jurisdictions.

Our firm combines detailed knowledge of federal fraud law, extensive experience in federal criminal defense, and insight from prosecutorial experience to provide effective advocacy. Whether you are under investigation, have been contacted by federal agents, or have been indicted for mail fraud, we can help protect your rights and fight for the best possible outcome.

Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your case and begin building your defense. Time is critical in federal fraud cases. Call us or submit our online contact form. We are available to assist you in protecting your freedom, your assets, and your future.

The § 1028A Trap

Aggravated Identity Theft charges carry a Mandatory Minimum sentence that cannot be served concurrently.

Underlying Crime
5 Years (Example)
+ ID Theft (1028A)
+ 2 Years
Total Prison Time
7 Years
Lack of Knowledge
Lack of Knowledge
Proving you didn't know the ID belonged to a real person.
Lawful Authority
Authorized use or power of attorney defenses.
No Intent
Lack of intent to commit the underlying felony.
Practice Areas
Charged With A Crime?

Don’t wait. Speak with an experienced criminal defense lawyer today.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at (516) 375-1107 to
schedule your free consultation.
We handle cases throughout New York and New Jersey.
New York Office
123-60 83rd Ave Suite 2R
Kew Gardens, New York 11415
Long Island Office
180 East Main Street Suite 206
Smithtown, New York 11787
Act Now. Protect Your Future.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Contact